Category Archives: PAD 525

PAD 525 Week 1 DQ 1 Principles and Processes and DQ 2 Understanding the Law NEW

PAD 525 Week 1 DQ 1 Principles and Processes and DQ 2 Understanding the Law NEW

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.assignmentcloud.com/pad-525-ashford/pad-525-week-1-dq-1-principles-and-processes-and-dq-2-understanding-the-law-new

For more classes visit

http://www.assignmentcloud.com

 

 

 

 

PAD 525 Week 1 DQ 1 Principles and Processes and DQ 2 Understanding the Law NEW

 

“Principles and Processes.” Please respond to the following:

 

Based upon the “rule of law” and its limits on public administrators, explain why a public administrator should not falsely conclude that they necessarily can alter human behavior merely by passing a law. Morality varies across and within societies and creates many commonalities that are essential to a functioning society.

 

Explain and provide examples on how society would function if it were bound by only natural law, or formal law, or truly entirely relativistic. Choose one and support your answer with examples or evidence.

 

DQ 2

 

“Understanding the Law.” Please respond to the following:

 

For public administrators, analyze the possible benefits of a public administrator knowing how to research regulation. Determine which of your listed benefits is the strongest and state why.

 

Using the Marbury v. Madison, consider how difficult it is to sort out the facts and rulings of the case. Discuss the complexities of reviewing a full case and state how you can outline future cases presented in this class.

PAD 525 Week 2 Assignment 1 Learning by Doing NEW

PAD 525 Week 2 Assignment 1 Learning by Doing NEW

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.assignmentcloud.com/pad-525-ashford/pad-525-week-2-assignment-1-learning-by-doing-new

For more classes visit

http://www.assignmentcloud.com

 

 

 

 

PAD 525 Week 2 Assignment 1 Learning by Doing NEW

 

Assignment 1: Learning by Doing

 

Using library or Internet resources provide a full citation for each of the following items:

 

Your state’s statute that defines what is considered to be a public record that must be made available to the public upon request.

 

The pre-World War I opinion by the U.S. Supreme Court holding, on re-argument, that a federal income tax was unconstitutional.

 

The federal statute authorizing the U.S. Secretary of Transportation to make payments to states for the value of materials stockpiled near federal highway construction projects in conformity with the project specifications.

 

The federal joint regulation of the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Department of the Interior, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and Department of Commerce, identifying the factors for listing, delisting, or reclassifying endangered species.

 

Your state’s administrative regulations specifying the licensure process for real estate agents.

 

The local ordinance in your municipality governing noise.

 

The most recent opinion of your state’s highest appeals court describing the extent to which the state constitution requires that the power of eminent domain be exercised only for a public use.

 

A recent federal trial court decision in your federal district describing the standard for summary judgment in federal court.

 

A law-review article published within the past five (5) years about libel law and political campaign advertisements.

 

Your assignment must:

 

Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.

 

Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

 

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

 

Interpret the language of the U.S. Constitution and the U.S. legal system in order to explain the principles and process of constitutional, regulatory, and administrative laws at the federal and state levels.

 

Use the “case” approach to the U.S. legal system for researching cases, laws, and other legal communications using technology and information resources.

 

Assess legal decisions related to the administration of public goods.

 

Use technology and information resources to research issues in constitution and administrative law.

 

Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic/organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following criteria:

 

Questions 1 through 3, and 5 through 9 are worth 10 points each

 

Question 4 is worth 20 points

PAD 525 Week 2 DQ 1 The Principles and DQ 2 The Constitution NEW

PAD 525 Week 2 DQ 1 The Principles and DQ 2 The Constitution NEW

 

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.assignmentcloud.com/pad-525-ashford/pad-525-week-2-dq-1-the-principles-and-dq-2-the-constitution-new

For more classes visit

http://www.assignmentcloud.com

 

 

 

 

PAD 525 Week 2 DQ 1 The Principles and DQ 2 The Constitution NEW

 

“The Principles”. Please respond to the following:

 

In Marbury v. Madison, describe and comment about both Jefferson’s approach and Madison’s logic, and weigh the options.

- Explain if Jefferson’s approach could have worked.- Discuss the significance of the case to the constitutional principles.

 

Analyze and discuss how the opinions in Griswold v. Connecticut reflect justices’ views about the roles of the judiciary and the legislature.

 

DQ 2

 

“The Constitution.” Please respond to the following:

 

Discuss the impact of Superior Court Justices who serve on the bench for decades. Do they reflect the prevailing norms better than elected legislatures? State why or why not.

 

The Constitution has always had several interpretations. Pick one amendment and provide an interpretation for and against that amendment.

 

Discuss how public administrators can juggle situations where two or more parties interpret the constitution differently.

PAD 525 Week 3 DQ 1 Due Process and DQ 2 Protection and Rights NEW

PAD 525 Week 3 DQ 1 Due Process and DQ 2 Protection and Rights NEW

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.assignmentcloud.com/pad-525-ashford/pad-525-week-3-dq-1-due-process-and-dq-2-protection-and-rights-new

For more classes visit

http://www.assignmentcloud.com

 

 

 

 

PAD 525 Week 3 DQ 1 Due Process and DQ 2 Protection and Rights NEW

 

PAD 525 WEEK 3 DISCUSSION QUESTION 1

 

“Due Process.” Please respond to the following:

 

Explain the significance of the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses to the public community. Provide an example different from the textbook.

 

In Mathews v. Eldridge, take a position on whether or not the court was merely pulling back from the hearing requirement it has previously suggested whenever government benefits are at stake. Provide details or evidence to support your position.

 

PAD 525 WEEK 3 DISCUSSION QUESTION 2

 

“Protection and Rights.” Please respond to the following:

 

In Grutter v. Bollinger, considering the 25-year notion, discuss whether equal protection really changes and whether or not the 2008 presidential election expedited this timeline.

 

Using the Brown v. Board of Education e-Activity, discuss the significance of the case and state whether race can “count” without it being determinative. Support your position with examples or evidence.

PAD 525 Week 4 Assignment 2 The Statutes NEW

PAD 525 Week 4 Assignment 2 The Statutes NEW

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.assignmentcloud.com/pad-525-ashford/pad-525-week-4-assignment-2-the-statutes-new

For more classes visit

http://www.assignmentcloud.com

 

 

 

 

PAD 525 Week 4 Assignment 2 The Statutes NEW

 

PAD 525 Week 4 Assignment 2

 

Assignment 2: The Statutes

 

Research, review, and analyze Anti-Miscegenation Statutes in the United States and chose two (2) relevant cases. Then, write a 4-5 page paper in which you:

 

Analyze and evaluate each case independently by providing the following (about two paragraphs per case):

 

Facts of the case

 

Issues

 

Rule

 

Compare and contrast both cases in regards to the Anti-Miscegenation Statutes.

 

Analyze how this statute could have influenced Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954) and the Fourteenth Amendment.

 

Explain the significance of this statute to the Defense of Marriage Act (DOM).

 

Your assignment must:

 

Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.

 

Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required page length.

 

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

 

Apply and rule on moral and ethical analysis to issues relevant to the public administration decision-making process.

 

Interpret the language of the U.S. Constitution and the U.S. legal system in order to explain the principles and process of constitutional, regulatory, and administrative laws at the federal and state levels.

 

Use the “case” approach to the U.S. legal system for researching cases, laws, and other legal communications using technology and information resources.

 

Use technology and information resources to research issues in constitution and administrative law.

 

Write clearly and concisely about issues in constitution and administrative law using proper writing mechanics.

 

Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic/organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using

PAD 525 Week 5 DQ 1 Property and DQ 2 Contracts and Companies NEW

PAD 525 Week 5 DQ 1 Property and DQ 2 Contracts and Companies NEW

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.assignmentcloud.com/pad-525-ashford/pad-525-week-5-dq-1-property-and-dq-2-contracts-and-companies-new

For more classes visit

http://www.assignmentcloud.com

PAD 525 Week 5 DQ 1 Property and DQ 2 Contracts and Companies NEW

PAD 525 Week 5 Discussion Question 1,

“Property.” Please respond to the following:

Evaluating Dolan v. City of Tigard, as a public administrator, take a position on whether you agree or disagree with the approach that the U.S. Supreme Court developed. Support your position with examples or evidence.

Analyzing Grose v. Sauvegeau, explain with details whether you agree or disagree that Sauvegeau should prevail.

PAD 525 Week 5 Discussion Question 2,

“Contracts and Companies.” Please respond to the following:

Evaluating Thompson v. Voldah as government takes on more and more functions, explain if it makes sense for the rules to be different for private contractual parties especially when the contract states (as with “duly authorized”). Support your position with examples or evidence.

 

Analyzing Brunoli, Inc. v. Town of Bradford, identify and then describe the remedies that should be available. Explain which you would recommend to be the best remedy for both parties.

PAD 525 Week 7 Assignment 3 Constitutional Rights NEW

PAD 525 Week 7 Assignment 3 Constitutional Rights NEW

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.assignmentcloud.com/pad-525-ashford/pad-525-week-7-assignment-3-constitutional-rights-new

For more classes visit

http://www.assignmentcloud.com

 

 

 

PAD 525 Week 7 Assignment 3 Constitutional Rights NEW

 

PAD 525 Week 7 Assignment 3,

 

Assignment 3: Constitutional Rights

 

Research, review and analyze Korb v. Raytheon, 707 F.Supp. 63 (D.Mass. 1989). Based on your research and the case, write a 5-6 page paper in which you:

 

Analyze and evaluate each case independently by providing the following (about two paragraphs per case):

 

Facts of the case

 

Issues

 

Rule

 

Analyze and explain the challenges with freedom of speech.

 

Analyze and explain any challenges with freedom of information.

 

Analyze and explain any challenges with employment law.

 

Analyze and discuss the public perceptions of Raytheon and its influence with the Department of Defense.

 

Analyze and discuss any fraud or misrepresentation on either side of the case.

 

Provide at least four (4) additional court cases that support your analysis.

 

Your assignment must:

 

Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.

 

Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required page length.

 

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

 

Recommend how the legal system addresses critical issues faced by public officials to include freedom of the press, funding of government contracts, separation of church and state, public ethics law, hiring lawyers, and handling civil litigation.

 

Evaluate legal subjects relevant to public administration to include property, government contracts, employment, and torts.

 

Relate the administrative process, constitutional and statutory requirements, to the scope of judicial review of administrative agency decisions.

 

Assess legal decisions related to the administration of public goods.

 

Use technology and information resources to research issues in constitution and administrative law.

 

Write clearly and concisely about issues in constitution and administrative law using proper writing mechanics.

 

Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic/organization of the paper, and language and writing skills

PAD 525 Week 7 DQ 1 Offenses and Punishment and DQ 2 Procedures and Prosecution NEW

PAD 525 Week 7 DQ 1 Offenses and Punishment and DQ 2 Procedures and Prosecution NEW

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.assignmentcloud.com/pad-525-ashford/pad-525-week-7-dq-1-offenses-and-punishment-and-dq-2-procedures-and-prosecution-new

For more classes visit

http://www.assignmentcloud.com

PAD 525 Week 7 Assignment 3 Constitutional Rights NEW

PAD 525 Week 7 Assignment 3,

Assignment 3: Constitutional Rights

Research, review and analyze Korb v. Raytheon, 707 F.Supp. 63 (D.Mass. 1989). Based on your research and the case, write a 5-6 page paper in which you:

Analyze and evaluate each case independently by providing the following (about two paragraphs per case):

Facts of the case

Issues

Rule

Analyze and explain the challenges with freedom of speech. 

Analyze and explain any challenges with freedom of information.

Analyze and explain any challenges with employment law.

Analyze and discuss the public perceptions of Raytheon and its influence with the Department of Defense.

Analyze and discuss any fraud or misrepresentation on either side of the case.

Provide at least four (4) additional court cases that support your analysis.

Your assignment must:

Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.

Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required page length.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

Recommend how the legal system addresses critical issues faced by public officials to include freedom of the press, funding of government contracts, separation of church and state, public ethics law, hiring lawyers, and handling civil litigation.

Evaluate legal subjects relevant to public administration to include property, government contracts, employment, and torts.

Relate the administrative process, constitutional and statutory requirements, to the scope of judicial review of administrative agency decisions.

Assess legal decisions related to the administration of public goods.

Use technology and information resources to research issues in constitution and administrative law.

Write clearly and concisely about issues in constitution and administrative law using proper writing mechanics.

 

Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic/organization of the paper, and language and writing skills

PAD 525 Week 8 DQ 1 Power Rules and DQ 2 Judicial Review NEW

PAD 525 Week 8 DQ 1 Power Rules and DQ 2 Judicial Review NEW

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.assignmentcloud.com/pad-525-ashford/pad-525-week-8-dq-1-power-rules-and-dq-2-judicial-review-new

For more classes visit

http://www.assignmentcloud.com

PAD 525 Week 8 DQ 1 Power Rules and DQ 2 Judicial Review NEW

PAD 525 WEEK 8 DISCUSSIONS,

DQ1

“Power Rules.” Please respond to the following:

Agency power combines the executive and legislative powers with respect to rule making and the legislative and judicial powers with respect to adjudication. Pick two agencies and compare and contrast the power each agency has in enforcing the regulations they are asked to uphold. Discuss why it is challenging for some agencies to enforce regulations and why it may be easy for other agencies to enforce regulations.

Evaluate Bring v. North Carolina State Bar. Apply the court’s ruling on delegation to another situation of your choice to determine at what point delegation should stop.

DQ 2

“Judicial Review.” Please respond to the following:

It has been stated, “Judicial review is concerned, not with the decision, but with the decision-making process.” Take a position on whether it should or should not be true. Support your position with examples or evidence.

 

Imagine a Libertarian is voted into the White House at the next presidential election. Speculate what this could do for any agency’s judicial review process.

PAD 525 Week 9 DQ 2 Translating Policy Arguments NEW

PAD 525 Week 9 DQ 2 Translating Policy Arguments NEW

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.assignmentcloud.com/pad-525-ashford/pad-525-week-9-dq-2-translating-policy-arguments-new

For more classes visit

http://www.assignmentcloud.com

PAD 525 Week 9 DQ 2 Translating Policy Arguments NEW

“Translating Policy Arguments” Please respond to the following:

Explain at least two key factors policy makers use when evaluating and using information provided to them in policy reports. Explain why it is important for an analyst to know how policy makers evaluate and use information.

From the case study, Case 9:1, highlight two key components a structured written narrative for a policy issue paper or policy memo. Then propose at least two benefits of developing a policy argument in this way. Provide an example to support your response.