ACC 618 Week 1 Assignment Case Study A Faulty Budget NEW
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com
ACC 618 Week 1 Assignment Case Study A Faulty Budget NEW
ACC 618 Week 1 Discussion 1 Ethical Considerations NEW
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.assignmentcloud.com/acc-618-ashford/acc-618-week-1-discussion-1-ethical-considerations
For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com
ACC 618 Week 1 Discussion 1 Ethical Considerations NEW
Ethical Considerations [CLO: 4]. 1st Post Due by Day 3. Assume you are an accounting manager at a mid-size company. The CEO asks you to omit or leave out certain financial figures from the Balance Sheet that would reflect negatively on the company to investors and the public. Because this request does not involve a direct manipulation of amounts or records, would you agree to this request? What ethical considerations exist for you in determining a course of action?
Incorporate concepts from this week’s lecture in your post. Your main post should be at least 250 words in length. Respond to at least two of your classmates’ posts.
ACC 618 Week 1 Discussion 2 Confidentiality Standards NEW
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com/
ACC 618 Week 1 Discussion 2 Confidentiality Standards NEW
Confidentiality Standards [CLO: 4]. 1st Post Due by Day 3. The IMA Statement of Ethical Professional Practice includes a confidentiality standard that requires members to “keep information confidential except when disclosure is authorized or legally required.” In the discussion of loyalty in chapter 1, a statement is made that “your ethical obligation is to report what you have observed to your supervisor and let her take the appropriate action.” Do you think there are any circumstances when you should go outside the company to report financial wrongdoing? If so, to what person/organization would you go? Why? If not, why would you not take the information outside the company?
Incorporate concepts from this week’s lecture in your post. Your main post should be at least 250 words in length. Respond to at least two of your classmates’ posts.
ACC 618 Week 2 Assignment Case Study – WorldCom NEW
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.assignmentcloud.com/acc-618-ashford/acc-618-week-2-assignment-case-study—worldcom
For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com/
ACC 618 Week 2 Assignment Case Study – WorldCom NEW
Case Study: WorldCom [CLO: 3]. Due by Day 7. Read Case Study 2-1: WorldCom in Chapter 3, page 78 of your text.
In two to three pages, supported by evidence from your text and from other research (at least one resource is required), answer the following questions:
What is the difference between accrual earnings and cash earnings? In addition to the effect on accrual earnings of capitalizing the line costs, how might the treatment mask the true nature of operating cash flows?
Identify the stakeholders in the WorldCom case and how their interests were affected by the financial fraud.
Use ethical reasoning to compare the actions of Cynthia Cooper in the WorldCom case to those of Sherron Watkins in the Enron case, discussed earlier in this chapter.
The paper
Must be two to three double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
Must include a separate title page with the following: o Titleofpaper
oStudent’sname
oCoursenameandnumber o Instructor’s name
oDatesubmitted
Must use at least two scholarly sources in addition to the course text.
ACC 618 Week 2 Discussion 1 Arthur Anderson NEW
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.assignmentcloud.com/acc-618-ashford/acc-618-week-2-discussion-1-arthur-anderson-new
For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com/
ACC 618 Week 2 Discussion 1 Arthur Anderson NEW
Arthur Anderson [CLO: 3]. 1st Post Due by Day 3. Arthur Andersen LLP was the auditor for Enron, WorldCom, Waste Management and other companies that committed fraud. Andersen was forced to shut its doors forever after a U.S. Department of Justice lawsuit against the firm charged that it had obstructed justice and lied to the government in the Enron case. One thing Andersen had done was to shred documents related to its audit of Enron before the government could get its hands on them. Some in the profession thought the government had gone too far given the facts and mediating circumstances including top management’s deception; others believed the punishment was unjustified because most accounting firms got caught up in similar situations during the late 1990s and early 2000s (pre-Sarbanes-Oxley). What do you believe? Use ethical reasoning to support your answer.
Incorporate concepts from this week’s lecture in your post. Your main post should be at least 250 words in length. Respond to at least two of your classmates’ posts.
ACC 618 Week 2 Discussion 2 AICPA Code of Professional Conduct NEW
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com/
ACC 618 Week 2 Discussion 2 AICPA Code of Professional Conduct NEW
AICPA Code of Professional Conduct [CLO: 1]. 1st Post Due by Day 3. Interpretation 102-4 of the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct that was discussed in Chapter 1 provides that a CPA should not knowingly misrepresent facts or subordinate her judgment when performing professional services. Explain how Rest’s model of moral development influences the steps a CPA should take to avoid subordinating professional judgment.
Incorporate concepts from this week’s lecture in your post. Your main post should be at least 250 words in length. Respond to at least two of your classmates’ posts.
ACC 618 Week 3 Assignment Case Study – United Thermostatic Controls NEW
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com/
ACC 618 Week 3 Assignment Case Study – United Thermostatic Controls NEW
Case Study: United Thermostatic Controls [CLO: 3, 4]. Due by Day 7. Read Case Study 3-3: United Thermostatic Controls in Chapter 3, page 156 of your text.
In two to three pages, supported by evidence from your text and
ACC 618 Week 3 Discussion 1 Business Roundtable NEW
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.assignmentcloud.com/acc-618-ashford/acc-618-week-3-discussion-1-business-roundtable-new
For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com/
ACC 618 Week 3 Discussion 1 Business Roundtable NEW
Business Roundtable [CLO: 4]. 1st Post Due by Day 3. According to the Business Roundtable, “Effective corporate governance requires a clear understanding of the respective roles of the board and senior management and their relationships with others in the corporate structure. The relationships of the board and management with stockholders should be characterized with candor; their relationships with employees should be characterized by fairness; their relationships with communities in which they operate should be characterized by good citizenship;
and their relationships with government should be characterized by a commitment to compliance.” Discuss what is meant by each element of the statement with respect to creating an ethical organizational environment.
Incorporate concepts from this week’s lecture in your post. Your main post should be at least 250 words in length. Respond to at least two of your classmates’ posts.
ACC 618 Week 3 Discussion 2 Dodd-Frank Reform NEW
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.assignmentcloud.com/acc-618-ashford/acc-618-week-3-discussion-2-dodd-frank-reform-new
For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com/
ACC 618 Week 3 Discussion 2 Dodd-Frank Reform NEW
Dodd-Frank Reform Act [CLO: 4]. 1st Post Due by Day 3. It is a distinguishing mark of actions labeled “whistleblowing” that the agent intends to force atten
ACC 618 Week 4 Assignment Case Study Gee Wiz NEW
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.assignmentcloud.com/acc-618-ashford/acc-618-week-4-assignment-case-study-gee-wiz-new
For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com/
ACC 618 Week 4 Assignment Case Study Gee Wiz NEWse
acc 618
Case Study: Gee Wiz [CLOs: 3, 4]. Due by Day 7. Read Case Study 4-6: Gee Wiz in Chapter 4, page 237 of your text.
In two to three pages, supported by evidence from your text and from other research (at least one resource is required), answer the following questions:
Do you think it is ethically appropriately for Wanda David to provide tax services to Wiz, an audit client and
customer of her employer, Gee, LLC, at the same time she works for the audit firm and is part of the audit
engagement team on the Wiz audit? Why or why not?
Has David violated any of her ethical responsibilities to Wiz? How about her ethical responsibilities to Gee,
LLC? Be specific and reference the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct in answering the question.
Assume you are David’s new boss in Chicago and just found out about her dual role as the tax accountant for Wiz and auditor for the firm on the Wiz audit. What would you do at this point?
The paper Must be two to three double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
Must include a separate title page with the following:
o Titleofpaper
o Student’sname
o Coursenameandnumber o Instructor’s name
o Datesubmitted
Must use at least two scholarly sources in addition to the course text.
Must document all sources in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.