Category Archives: CRT 205

CRT 205 Week 9 Final Project Comprehensive Argument Analysis

To Buy This material Click below link

http://www.assignmentcloud.com/crt-205/crt-205-week-9-final-project-comprehensive-argument-analysis

Final Project: Comprehensive Argument Analysis
The Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center database at the University Library provides a wealth of arguments to which you can apply your critical thinking skills. Find this database by logging into to the Library and selecting the  Article Databases—Specialized link. From the results page, scroll down to select the Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center link.

  Resources: Appendix A, Appendix E, and the University Library

  Due Date: Day 7 [Individual forum]

  Choose two topics from the Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center that interest you and locate a set of materials from the database for each topic. If you choose school violence as one of your topics, for example, you might find a magazine article that argues that violence in the media causes school violence and a Web site that persuasively argues that violence in the media is not responsible for school violence.

  Conduct a similar search for your second topic. When finished, you should have two sources per topic. Note: You may use sources from any combination of the Viewpoints, Magazines, Academic Journals, News (use sources marked Editorial and Column), and Web sites database sections.

  Use the form in Appendix E to critically analyze your four sources. Fill out one form for each source.

Provide the title of the source.

o  Provide the source citation. Locate the citation by clicking on the Source Citation link at the top of the page when viewing the source.

o  Identify the principal issue presented by the source.

o  Identify any examples of bias presented by the author. If none exist, explain how you determined this.

o  Identify any areas that are vague or ambiguous. If none exist, explain how you determined this.

o  Do you find the source credible? Explain your reasoning.

o  Identify and name any rhetorical devices used by the author. If none exist, explain how you determined this.

o  Identify and name any fallacies used by the author. If none exist, explain how you determined this.

o  State one argument made by the author.

o  Identify the premises and conclusion of the argument.

o  Is the author’s argument valid or invalid, sound or unsound, strong or weak? Explain how you determined this.

o  Does the author use moral reasoning? If not, explain how you determined this.

  Post Appendix E as an attachment.

For more Assignments visit

http://www.assignmentcloud.com

CRT 205 Week 9 Capstone Checkpoint

To Buy This material Click below link

http://www.assignmentcloud.com/crt-205/crt-205-week-9-capstone-checkpoint

Capstone CheckPoint

  Answer the following questions in a 100- to 200-word response. Cover each bullet point in your answer.

o  In the future, how will thinking critically influence the ways that you:
  Read?
  Write?
  Process information?

o  Why and how could you apply critical thinking when evaluating each of the following:
  Articles
  Advertising
  Media

For more Assignments visit

http://www.assignmentcloud.com

CRT 205 Week 8 Exercise Review Quizzes (Chapter 12)

To Buy This material Click below link

http://www.assignmentcloud.com/crt-205/crt-205-week-8-exercise-review-quizzes-chapter-12

Exercise: Review Quizzes (Chapter 12)

  Due Date: Day 5 [Individual forum] 

Resource: Review Quiz Tutorial

  Complete the following Review Quiz at http://www.mhhe.com/criticalthinking8

  Copy and paste your quiz results to a Microsoft ® Word document.

  Post the document as an attachment.

Ch. 12    Moral Reasoning Quiz I

For more Assignments visit

http://www.assignmentcloud.com

CRT 205 Week 8 DQ 1 And DQ 2

To Buy This material Click below link

http://www.assignmentcloud.com/crt-205/crt-205-week-8-dq-1-and-dq-2

DQ 1 - Describe a time when your moral values influenced the way you responded to an issue. What differences did you notice between your logical reasoning process and your moral reasoning process? What were the possible consequences or outcomes of your decision?

DQ 2 - State your stance on the Terri Schiavo case, and identify the moral value judgment that influenced you to choose your stance.
An example of a stance is, •Terri Schiavo should have been allowed to live, despite her persistent vegetative state.– An example of a moral value judgment is, •No person’s death should be decided by another—people should die naturally.
An example of moral relativism could be that American culture accepts many religious standpoints, making it difficult for its citizens to agree on the religious morality of the issue brought to light by Terri Schiavo and her family.

 Moore and Parker (2007) define utilitarianism as the belief that •…if an individual can feel pleasure and pain, then he or she deserves moral consideration (p. 425). Consider that many proponents of both sides of the Shiavo case thought they had Terri’s best interests in mind—a moral consideration.
Discuss with your classmates how moral relativism and utilitarianism apply to this issue. 

For more Assignments visit

http://www.assignmentcloud.com

CRT 205 Week 7 Checkpoint Argument Validity

To Buy This material Click below link

http://www.assignmentcloud.com/crt-205/crt-205-week-7-checkpoint-argument-validity

CheckPoint 1: Argument Validity  Resources: Ch. 7 and the Answers, Suggestions, and Tips for Triangle Exercises section of Critical Thinking
Due Date: Day 3 [Individual forum].
Complete Exercise 7-9 on pp. 236-237 of the text.

For more Assignments visit

http://www.assignmentcloud.com

CRT 205 Week 7 Assignment Argument Evaluation

To Buy This material Click below link

http://www.assignmentcloud.com/crt-205/crt-205-week-7-assignment-argument-evaluation

Assignment: Argument Evaluation

Resource: Appendix 1 of Critical Thinking

Due Date: Day 7 [Individual forum]
Read the article “Controlling Irrational Fears After 9/11” on pp. 456-458 of Appendix 1.

Identify at least two arguments in the article. Outline the premises and conclusions of each argument you find. Then, answer the following questions for each argument,making sure to explain how you arrived at your answers.

o Do the premises sufficiently support the conclusions?

o Are the arguments either deductively valid or inductively strong, or are they invalid or weak?

o Are the premises true or plausibly true, or are they difficult to prove?

Note that you may choose to evaluate invalid or weak arguments as long as you describe how they are invalid or weak.

For more Assignments visit

http://www.assignmentcloud.com

CRT 205 Week 6 DQ 1 And DQ 2

To Buy This material Click below link

http://www.assignmentcloud.com/crt-205/crt-205-week-6-dq-1-and-dq-2

DQ 1 - View the Vacuum Sales digital story located on aXcess for Week Six. Of the two arguments provided in this example, which is valid and which is sound? When you are building an argument for an issue that is significant to you, do you think it is more important to be valid or sound? Explain your answer.
Resource Required

Vacuum Salesdigital story

Grading Guide

A deductive argument can be valid even when one of its premises is false. A sound deductive argument contains true premises and a true conclusion.

The two arguments provided in the digital story are as follows:

Voice of Man Speaking for Salesman

“Anyone who wants a comfortable, clean home needs this amazing vacuum cleaner. You certainly look like someone who likes having a really clean home. So, you definitely need this vacuum cleaner!” (A valid deductive argument)

Voice of Man Speaking for Wife:

“Honey, our carpets are clean and we already have a working vacuum cleaner, so we don’t need a new one!” (A sound deductive argument)

 

DQ 2 - Imagine your child is trying to prove that she did not steal chocolate chip cookies from the cookie jar, so she makes this argument: “There are no chocolate stains on my hands, so I couldn’t have stolen the cookies.”

Postyour response to the following: Does this example require deductive or inductive logic? What are the premises? Are the premises stated or unstated? What is the argument’s conclusion? In your opinion, is this a convincing argument? Why or why not?

Grading Guide

Through discussion students should determine the following: The example requires inductive logic. The premises are that there are no chocolate stains on the child’s hands, and that chocolate on one’s hands is an indication of having handled chocolate chip cookies. The first premise is stated and the second premise is unstated. The conclusion is, “…so I couldn’t have stolen the cookies.”

Students should state their opinions regarding whether or not they believe the argument is persuasive.

 

For more Assignments visit

http://www.assignmentcloud.com

CRT 205 Week 5 Assignment Categorizing Fallacies

To Buy This material Click below link

http://www.assignmentcloud.com/crt-205/crt-205-week-5-assignment-categorizing-fallacies

Assignment: Categorizing Fallacies

 Resources: Appendix 2: The Top Ten Fallacies of All Time, Ch. 5 & 6 of Critical Thinking, and Appendix C

 Due Date: Day 7 [Individual forum]

Complete the fallacy matrix in Appendix C.

Post Appendix C as an attachment.

For more Assignments visit

http://www.assignmentcloud.com

CRT 205 Week 5 Checkpoint Identifying Fallacies Checkpoint

To Buy This material Click below link

http://www.assignmentcloud.com/crt-205/crt-205-week-5-checkpoint-identifying-fallacies-checkpoint

CheckPoint: Identifying Fallacies Resource: Ch. 6 End-of-Chapter Exercises and the Answers, Suggestions, and Tips for Triangle Exercises section of Critical Thinking

Complete Exercise 6-6 on pp. 194-196 of Critical Thinking. You are not required to complete questions displaying a triangle () symbol.

Copy and paste the question numbers and answers into the body of a post.

For more Assignments visit

http://www.assignmentcloud.com